In a culture where premarital sex (fornication, that ignored sin) has been utterly normalised to the point where it has become part of the growing experience of the average individual, don’t expect political dividend from criticising the same.
Not for a loooong time, anyway.
“In a culture where premarital sex (fornication, that ignored sin) has been utterly normalised to the point where it has become part of the growing experience of the average individual, don’t expect political dividend from criticising the same.”
On top of all that we the tax payer must finance these women’s adventures in premarital sex!
Could you imagine the outrage of the Feminists if Medicare were paying for Viagra?
In a culture where premarital sex (fornication, that ignored sin) has been utterly normalised to the point where it has become part of the growing experience of the average individual, don’t expect political dividend from criticising the same.
Someone posted here a few weeks ago about a conversation he (she?) had with his daughter (high school or college age), who had been dating a boy for about six months and then the boy broke up with her because she refused to have sex with him.
The preachers should also save some energy and attention for the males with these attitudes. The burden is overwhelmingly placed on the woman to enforce the morals. The immoral males will simply shrug and go on to the next "easy" woman, and the moral woman is left abandoned.
Note I said "males" and not "men." A man is responsible.
“(fornication, that ignored sin)”
In the decadent state of New York, the two most influential politicians (Cuomo and Bloomberg) lived openly with their girlfriends while in office.
Nobody, except an obscure priest, made a peep.