Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr

Steal? Who says? Lincoln could have sent negotiators to decide how much of the standing navy, army, western lands, etc. rightfully was due to be turned over to the South (in addition to the obvious areas within their borders), but he wanted war. That’s aggression.


218 posted on 01/12/2014 12:30:27 PM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: SampleMan

The slavers had no desire to negotiate - they were all about making belligerent demands. There was no reason why Lincoln should be compelled to negotiate - but he did try anyway. His attempts were rebuffed by the belligerents.


219 posted on 01/12/2014 12:33:28 PM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

To: SampleMan
Lincoln could have sent negotiators to decide how much of the standing navy, army, western lands, etc. rightfully was due to be turned over to the South

He didn't have to, it is historical fact that the South sent a peace delegation to DC that Lincoln totally ignored.

234 posted on 01/12/2014 2:43:45 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson