Character does count, but we are dealing with the universe of college jocks here. This was not the Nobel Peace Prize (oh, wait, BAD example.)
My point is this, if we were to count agreeing to have sex with good looking women who want your body - as bad character for the purposes of football awards, there would be no awards given. I obviously do not know that this was the case with Winston, but it appears to have been given some of the evidence.
If at some point a big time cover up is exposed, and the use of the date rape drug is demonstrated - then I’m sure the award will be withdrawn, as has happened in the recent past with Reggie Bush. As of today, however, there is no basis, even on character, not to give him the award. Seems like some people are assuming guilt.
I don’t assume he is guilty of anything beyond bad judgment and weak morals. I am a sinner too and don’t expect every jock to be a saint. However, my 10 year old nephew has a poster of Winston on his wall along with other great athletes and I know what kind of message this sends him.
I thought his play deserved the award, but I was a bit surprised he won it for that reason and it is obvious some of the voters agreed.
I am a parent and it seems overwhelming when I consider the messages my children get via the media and culture. It is unfortunate all this dirt came out due to what appears to be a very questionable accusation, but the interview reports made it clear this was a regular happening in the house. The Heisman award makes it clear to impressionable minds that the only thing that matters is the play on the field and the same kind of promiscuous behavior many criticize in the homosexual community is okay for heterosexuals.
It will unfortunately get even more publicity as the civil suit happens now that some attorney sees dollar signs.