Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

“Except it was a smooth bore.”

Yep. Whenever I hear someone say “well, assult weapons had not been invented when the constitution was written”. The implication being that they would have been banned had they been. I respond by telling them they’re wrong; if our authors of the constitution had intended to stratify gun ownership by technology they had the opportunity to do so by banning the Pennsylvania/Kentucky long rifle. These are the weapons that created the sniper. In fact, the Brits hated them so much that they declared them to be unfair and that they should be banned from the field of battle. So, there you have it.....


10 posted on 11/17/2013 3:25:10 AM PST by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: snoringbear

Remind them back then that speech was written on parchment with quill and ink, and then ask them if they want that freedom confined to that standard.


16 posted on 11/17/2013 4:31:20 AM PST by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: snoringbear

“Whenever I hear someone say “well, assault weapons had not been invented when the constitution was written...”

I like to point out radio and TV and phones had not been invented so those should not have the same consideration as freedom of, “the press”. Reductio ad absurdum


21 posted on 11/17/2013 4:55:03 AM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: snoringbear
I respond by telling them they’re wrong; if our authors of the constitution had intended to stratify gun ownership by technology they had the opportunity to do so by banning the Pennsylvania/Kentucky long rifle. These are the weapons that created the sniper. In fact, the Brits hated them so much that they declared them to be unfair and that they should be banned from the field of battle. So, there you have it.....

The governments of serveral nations tried to ban them long before that. Rifles were so accurate that a sniper could pick off an officer with no problem. This irritated the ruling class to no end. They even brought the clergy into it, the church saying that the reason rifles were so accurate was because demons hid in the rifling and rode the bullet out of the bore guiding it to its target. They proved their point by cutting crosses on silver bullets and shooting them at targets. Naturally the deformed silver bullets shot poorly, giving credence to the clergy's arguments, or so they claimed.

Before rifles, in the earliest days of firearms, the ruling class tried to get them banned from battle because it put the peasant(infantry) class on equal footing with knights, a peasant with a gun could bring down a knight when the job of the infantry was to act as targets for the knights of both sides of the battle. No fair killing the royalty.

The ruling class of today are still trying to ban firearms from the peasants(us)but we are still fighting them off, in this country at any rate.

28 posted on 11/17/2013 6:17:39 AM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: snoringbear

“The Second Amendment only Covers Muskets!!!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93E7DLcdLeE


32 posted on 11/17/2013 7:27:36 AM PST by WhiskeyX ( provides a system for registering complaints about unfair broadcasters and the ability to request a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson