World Bank Whistleblower Karen Hudes Reveals How The Global Elite Rule The World

The Economic Collapse Blog ^ | September 30th, 2013 | Michael Snyder

[MrChips]

My favorite movie.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.

[Rebelbase]

“After the corporate wars . . . .”

The movie Demolition Man had a similar quote:

“Taco Bell was the only restaurant to survive the franchise war. 2: So? 1: So, now all restaurants are Taco Bell.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFiDoOgRTpk

[dubyagee]

Bfl

[MrChips]

God forbid!

[RckyRaCoCo]

Without reading further...whats this persons views on Soros?

[Texas Fossil]

I am sure you are correct.

[PieterCasparzen]

And that somewhat explains a whole lot about the question about Putin..........I’ve never uncovered any mention of the Romanov’s or other prominent Russian royalty connected to anything having to do with the Bildeberger’s. Meaning, Putin and Russia itself, is out of the loop of wealth and power elites.

You've got to understand the real roots of communism. I'm going to provide a few example "linkages" in an upcoming "if I ever get it done" thread.

Long story short, communism is an invention of British financial elites.

Hard to grasp, you've got to look at it from the monopolist's perspective. They completely financially take over - from behind the scenes - a while nation. It becomes a "captive market"; all financing is provided by them, they get a piece of everyone's work output since the communist government collects for them and pays them interest. They also get sole concessions to operate any industries the communist government needs help operating.

By the time of the Russian Revolution, Rockefeller and Morgan insterests had grown riduculously large and powerful, and their growth had been financed by European banking. Thus Wall Street jumped in to helped finance the revolution in Russia once it went operational.

Arriving at one world government must obviously be done a step at a time, not all at once. Nation by nation. The Romanovs would not play ball enough to new world order's liking. Tsar Nicholas had hundreds of millions of his wealth in various BANKS outside of Russia. The Russian people were used to living under authoritarian rule as peasants, thus, the experiment of communism could possibly be imposed on them. Communism had been written about and toyed with throughout the 1800's in many places, including America by people with direct links to those same British elites.

The Tsar's wealth inside Russia became "the states", the wealth outside Russia "never returned".

Western finance and business lined up to finance and set up operations inside the new "communist" Russia. There are printed American news stories from those days that confirm this, along with corporate and other records. Ford had a plant in Russia I believe by the 1930's. David Rockefeller was treated like royalty by the USSR any time he dropped by for a visit. W. Averell Harriman hosted Soviet dignitaries at his home when they visited the US. These are red-white-and-blue "American capitalists" ??? The real "back" conversations where orders are transmitted happen on that "backchannel" level by people whose power transcends any East-West national borders. People who can always freely travel where they want on private planes. This is why Obama said something was "above his pay scale" - he means it. For the real power people, the US Presidency may not technically "report" to them, but he is forced by their knowledge to hang on every word of their emissaries (the President's advisors) when he has a major decision to make.

The Russians have always had this backchannel relationship with these powerful folks, even as the US, UK and European governments each have their own relationship with the same bankers/financiers.

This puts the cartel in the drivers seat and governments and politicians trying to do what the cartel requires and tap dance enough for their citizens to keep them in the dark and happy "enough".

There have always been high-level "question mark" relationships between the UK and US elites and the Soviets, they're just never repeated after any disclosure by the press. Never repeated in the press and excluded from school textbooks as well. Just for starters you can read up on the Cambridge Five, but you'll find some key elements of the story that were left out of the Military Channel's recent hour long show on them.

[PieterCasparzen]

Thanks for the ping.

[DannyTN]

A lot of that is simply the effect of having the Gay MSM on his side.

[DannyTN]

A lot of that is simply the effect of having the Gay MSM on his side.

[PieterCasparzen]

What drew my interest is my puzzlement about the earthly power that put Obozo in office. He has no real past, no accomplishment, no attachment to the US. All 3 branches of government know he is a total Fraud, how can no one pretend to oppose him? It makes no sense.

That's the logical "red flag" that something is not as it is purported to be.

This is bigger than the Builder Burgers, the global bankers, the Muzzie Oil Interest, the Commies, the Dictators. All of them combined? In what fashion.

One has to understand the "org chart", who reports to whom. This is how large criminal investigations are done - the players in the criminal organization are investigated and the investigators develop a literal "org chart" so they understand who is calling the shots.

One needs to understand the relative size or power of the players. For instance, the middle eastern oil interests. They are financially a pimple compared to the US. The US has a dozen aircraft carriers; latest cost figure is about $6 billion a pop. The US economy, total goods bought and sold for a year... is so big that it is the equivalent of more than 2,000 aircraft carriers. Meaning, in a pinch, if the US wanted to build 100 new aircraft carriers, we could. NWO, which controls banking, finance and industry, would approve the US government borrowing like crazy, and the ships would get built. This is what happened in WWII, massive military effort.

The middle eastern nations that are allied with the West, if you look realistically at them, are really nothing but oil wells with puppet governments ruling over a peasantry. Their ruling families are vassals for new world order. New world order is actually who calls the shots for the US government. So publicly our middle eastern "allies" have some sort of love/hate relationship with the US government. But that is all a show. Their ruling families are vassals, and new world order, through their private espionage operations, which control the top positions in the CIA, can depose them at any time the choose to. In fact, that is what the "arab spring" was.

Karen Hudes may be working for new world order or merely been bitten by them and only know about the teeth that bit her.

[Toddsterpatriot]

I still believe Pres. Kennedy was assassinated because he dared to think and act that the USA had Constitutional authority to print It’s own money

Huh?

[Toddsterpatriot]

If the US Treasury simply created the dollars it needed to fund the federal deficit every year - it would spend the same amount into the economy - but then the Treasury, i.e., the taxpayer, would not owe the accumulated deficit plus interest.

It worked for Zimbabwe.

[noinfringers2]

Yes indeed! Kennedy had printed by USA presses by and under the auspices of USA treasury, which was part of his Constitutional cabinet over $200,000,000.00 in USA dollars These went on the market but I do not know for what purpose. It gives me more interesting follow up opportunity.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Kennedy had printed by USA presses by and under the auspices of USA treasury, which was part of his Constitutional cabinet over $200,000,000.00 in USA dollars

So what? US Notes were printed before.

These went on the market but I do not know for what purpose.

But you know it resulted in his death?

[txhurl]

Maybe because even back then they realized the free blackmarket economy was more of a tax base, via sales tax, than an IRS racket.

[noinfringers2]

You have posted two distinctly different notes and I would I would take from your comment this was to discredit my remarks. 1) the first shown is not a USA Treasury note. It is a version of a Fed Reserve note as indicated buy the words’ ..pay to the bearer on demand..’ Secondly the note is I would read the date as 1953 this is well into the period after Wilson and FDR who were big pushers for internationalist bankers. 2) The second $5 note apparently was printed in 1953. Pres. Kennedy was assassinated on Nov. 22,1953. Coincidental? Secondly I see the note does not have the wording of your first note i.e. payable to bearer but very simply states ‘United States Note’. I am also intrigued by the wording on this note that ‘This Note Is Legal Tender for All Debts, Public and Private’. This vastly different and more succinct than what is printed on your first example. So as for now I will hold even more so to my thoughts that Pres. Kennedy might well have been assassinated for daring to oppose the international powers and probably of the same cabal that stuck Obama in as eligible for POTUSA.

[Toddsterpatriot]

1) the first shown is not a USA Treasury note. It is a version of a Fed Reserve note as indicated buy the words’

No. The first is a United States Note, 1953.

The second is a United States Note, 1963.

Both printed by the US Treasury, not the Fed.

If the 1963 Note resulted in JFK's death, why didn't the 1953 Note kill Eisenhower?

[Fightin Whitey]

GUILTY!

(of something)