Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
I think we're letting words get in the way of agreeing. When someone receives help from friends, family, civil society or even local government they are much more likely to understand the burden they place on others, strive to succeed and even at some point help another. When the help is channeled through a distant government, it is much more difficult to see the cost.

Self indulgence is likely to require some sort of enabling. The distant Federal government type is astronomically more likely to lead to self-destruction than help from those we have a personal connection to.

168 posted on 08/26/2013 5:42:58 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: Red Dog #1

I do agree with that. I also think Americans, already being the most generous peoples on the planet, would be even more generous if the FedMob wasn’t stealing half of their incomes. In addition I think it would be easier to hold privately funded charities accountable than it is to hold the FedMob to their promises and duties.


171 posted on 08/27/2013 9:05:02 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson