This is in regards to the election for mayor of Hattiesburg MS. An election that was clearly stolen.
This link might help a bit with background information:
http://www.kingfish1935.blogspot.com/search?q=hattiesburg
Dupree is the black incumbent mayor and Ware is the white Republican challenger.
At least THIS Republican is fighting for a fair election. Look for the RNC to disown him.
The only reason I can see why Ware is fighting when Republicans generally don’t is the Republican Party is prohibited from challenging elections, and Ware is technically an independent. It’s a voluntary restriction on the part of the GOP, and does not apply to Democrats. I have no idea why this imbalance exists, but I’m pretty sure that it does.
Am I to understand a witness was intimidated by the city to keep him from testifying that his absentee ballot “disappeared?” First, how does he know that, is there something like a certified mail receipt sent to the voter? Secondly, the background check turned up a speeding ticket, that’s all. Why didn’t the witness show up to testify? Was there another action of intimidation besides the illegal background check?
I meant the contrived and convoluted explanation didn’t make sense.
Effing A-holes.
This is the type of crap I tell my friends and lovers of big government is the issue about civil liberties.
When they kan’t wrap their head around it I start explaining Nixon and that the knife has two edges.
Do they honestly think as a tactic for winning(their team) it’s acceptable to use any action at any cost?
Or, or, again, or...would they be comfortable with another Nixon or another Republican acting on the foundational imprimature of precedent and then!!!; Moving the goal posts to where they want, controlling the referees, the time outs and total control of the clock???!!!!
Is that the game you want to play?
I’ll be the banker anytime you want to play Monopoly or The Dealer anytime you want to play Blackjack.
Or we can all play by rules everyone agrees to, lest chaos ensue.