Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright; Norm Lenhart
Norm, since you have not complied and tried to define the terms, allow me: I believe you are using the term 'compromise' with different definitions. I would use the followign term:

Based on these definitions, I bet you agree much more than you disagree.

Prove me wrong. Or right.

Commence.

86 posted on 08/16/2013 11:07:42 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz

NL doesn’t want to properly define the terms, because that would expose the weakness in his argument and knock him off his self imposed high horse.


90 posted on 08/16/2013 11:09:47 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz

Compromise in the modern venacular means Republicans bowing scraping and bending a knee to whatever liberals demand.

It means conservatives forget that electing pro abort repubs has a direct effect of very dead babies.

It means out military gets sexually assaulted in record numbers with the full blessing (in the idealistic sense) of the last GOP candidate

It means any number of things we all know by heart. So I ask why is it exactly we should abandon our principles to gain the benefits of vaccusucked baby parts, buggered servicemen, dead Mexicans and dead SEALS et all?

Because that aint straw. It’s real and the very direct result of electing ‘compromise’ Just so we could WIN!

Look what we won.


98 posted on 08/16/2013 11:15:05 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson