....another straw argument. Good thing Reagan and Helms realized that all you had to do was take over 51% of the party to change it, even if you don’t.
And ask Rush, Levin, Cruz, Paul, Palin, etc why they haven’t started 3P yet if its no more difficult.
And why haven’t one of the some 100 3p’s worked yet if its so do able?
And where will you find staffers for this new party who are immune to human nature, you know, like turf protection, love of power, greed, etc. What will you use to staff? Robot? Martians? Or are you of some naive understanding that there are people out there who want to be in politics but have no interest in their own power??
Where the hell will you find that?
Everyything is either pointless or a strawmann with you..
So you think we get 51 percent and that it... The people who lose all the perks of the current leadership/that they Provide are just gonna go along happily with a lot less and TEA rules without sabotaging the whole thing huh?
These are logical considerations. And you dismissing them only shows how little thought you put into your argument.
Instead of dismissing everything I say in these tender moments we share, you’d do a lot better than making an ass of yourself by such alynski inspired BS.
And then there’s the legacy of the name. Funny how many people/indys will never vote GOP because of it. SOLELY because of it. But as many elections have shown, the same candidates once in another party/with their platforms intact, win.
It happens and you know it. So thats no straw man either. But you just keep pretending I’m whatever you pretend.