[wbill]

Levin would be excellent.

Limbaugh would likely be OK, he'd at least take it as a serious responsibility.

Hannity would debate with himself for 90 minutes.

[SharpRightTurn]

“The Republican National Committee, already threatening to block CNN and NBC from hosting 2016 primary debates if they air planned features on Hillary Clinton, is also looking to scrap the old model of having reporters and news personalities ask the questions at candidate forums.”

I'll believe this when I see it. The Republican establishment types have battered spouse syndrome. They crave being covered by ABCCBSNBCPMSNBCCNN etc., even though they know they will be abused and excoriated by them.

And though the establishment types may not like some of the questions from the LameStreamMedia, they would like even less questions coming from Limbaugh, Levin, and Hannity.

[Resolute Conservative]

If Sarah doesn’t run she should moderate it.

[Joe Boucher]

no way the dems let this occur.
Instead they’ll insist on reporters who are in the tank for dem causes.
Right there ms.crowley ya piece of crap.

[CatherineofAragon]

Levin and Limbaugh——absolutely.

But please, not Hannity. He’d ask the same three or four questions in an endless loop.

“Do you believe Republicans want dirty air and water?”

“Do you think Republicans want to throw Grandma off the cliff?”

(football toss)

[traditional1]

Levin or Limbaugh, YES; Hannity NO WAY.

[EmilyGeiger]

Levin or Limbaugh.... Hannity just doesn’t have the killer instinct. He talks a good game but never quite goes in for the kill or starts saying my friend.

[Georgia Girl 2]

Its about time.