Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer

I don’t know why this “surprises” people.

The average life span in the late 18th C. was about 30 or so.

Folks didn’t live in their momma’s basement until 35.

A lot of people were accomplished by their early 20s.

Napoleon burst on the scene in Europe at the ripe old age of 26. And on and on.

I don’t know why this is so surprising.


10 posted on 08/13/2013 3:51:14 PM PDT by ConradofMontferrat ( According to mudslimz, my handle is a HATE CRIME. And I HOPE they don't like it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ConradofMontferrat
Folks didn’t live in their momma’s basement until 35

'Starter' homes did not start at $450,000 as they do now in places like Washington DC either....

Most of the 18th century settlers lived on land that either they or their parents had simply patented.

28 posted on 08/13/2013 4:33:28 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConradofMontferrat

I think the average lifespan from that period is a little misleading since it’s dragged down high childhood mortality rates. If you survived to be an adult your odds of surviving to old age weren’t that different from us moderns. In other words, the founders would have been considered relatively young men even in their time.


36 posted on 08/13/2013 5:07:09 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConradofMontferrat

Average means little when man died from disease, including as children, and many women died related to childbirth.

MANY people lived to be very old. You can see it in the graveyards. They just had much more death across all ages, while today we tend to get over or never get diseases.


68 posted on 08/14/2013 6:39:50 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConradofMontferrat

Those old, average life expectancy figures were skewed by high infant mortality rates. A man of the Colonial era who made it to adulthood could expect to live into his mid-50s.


74 posted on 08/14/2013 8:14:46 AM PDT by JerseyanExile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConradofMontferrat

“I don’t know why this is so surprising.”

Because historical perspective is a vanishing virtue.


84 posted on 08/15/2013 11:58:00 AM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConradofMontferrat

Because folks don’t know their history.............


92 posted on 08/15/2013 6:53:45 PM PDT by Osage Orange (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConradofMontferrat; SunkenCiv; All

The average life span was about 30, but if you lived to age 5 then the average would be a lot higher. My late husband had family records from the middle 1800s in southern Illinois. One ancestor had 9 children. Five died around the age of 2 in August or September. They no doubt died of “summer diarrhea” which killed many children when they were weaned at that age. The ones who lived mostly survived into their 60s.


94 posted on 08/15/2013 11:18:17 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson