The likeliest scenario is that Obama told his agent the truth. That he was born in Kenya but the birth was registered in HI. That is the only explanation that explains all the anomalies—including the fact that the entire Kenyan Parliament acknowledged Obama’s Kenyan birth. Also explains Obama’s ‘birth documents’ as being ‘something written down’, ‘a notation’.
Though of course Obama’s most ardent Obots will never see that. They are blinded, literally, by their love of & service to Obama.
Less than one year before the publisher's brochure, articles appeared nationwide stating that Obama was born in Hawaii. The Los Angeles Times wrote a very long article on him in which they had extensive quotes. That article stated Obama was born in Hawaii.
For goodness sakes, the very book that the publisher was going to publish stated that Obama was born in Hawaii. Why on earth would a blurb publicizing Obama's book purposely state something contrary to what's in the book???
The State of Hawaii adamantly and consistently maintains that Obama was born in Hawaii.
And I'll take our Congress over Kenya's Parliament any day. Our Congress passed a resolution, in 2009, declaring Hawaii to be Obama's birthplace.
So your evidence is a brochure which was not fact-checked and a foreign legislative body. And I'm blinded?