[bluecat6]

“If their experts were wrong about that, what else were they wrong about?”

Gee, it took this long to get to the punch line.

Its not the truth or the facts that matter it would seem. It is the discrediting effort.

Never saw this coming.

The reverse engineering game is a fools game.

Will the national archives buy some computers to show all the (in)famous ‘documents’ from this administration since it appears none really exist as an actual document.

Real documents matter - LFBC, COLB and passports. All else - is just 1s and 0s.

[BigGuy22]

"Real documents matter"
__

What about the Letters of Verification?

They are "real documents" -- they are printed on paper, and they have signature stamps that you can hold up to the light and raised seals that you can feel.

They -- the paper documents -- verify the information on the LFBC and the COLB, and they have been submitted to court where they can be examined by the judge and challenged by the opposition.

Since they have stamps and seals, they are self-authenticating, and because they are prima facie evidence, all the information they contain will be accepted as valid until such time as they, the Letters of Verification themselves, are proven to be invalid.

I haven't seen any evidence that the LoV's are inauthentic. Have you?

[4Zoltan]

“Its not the truth or the facts that matter it would seem. It is the discrediting effort.”

If there is any effort to discredit the CCP, it would seem to be by the CCP.

From the March 1st 2012 press conference to the June 1st, 2013 CSPOA presentation, Zullo, et al have said unequivocally that the digital artifacts on the PDF could not have been caused by anything other than human manipulation.

Remember when they told us that the statistical codes were unequivocal evidence of forgery?

How many members of Congress are going to jump on this train if they think they have been lied to or if there is even the hint that the CCP is a bunch of incompetents?

How important is credibility in a criminal investigation?