Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LucyT; null and void; Cold Case Posse Supporter; Flotsam_Jetsome; circumbendibus; Fantasywriter; ...

“Does this mean the CCP accepts NBCs results?

“According to the CCP what are the anomalies caused by the scanner versus those caused by forgery?

“Does the CCP concede that their experts were wrong about MRC bwing a source for the digital anomalies?”

Zullo, Gillar and Gallups have all explicitly stated that NBC’s claims to date are NOT 100% EXCULPATORY. Partially exculpatory is NOT fully exculpatory (take note Fogblower Butterfly Bilderberg, Esq) as explained clearly by Gillar.

The CCP team are NOT going to reveal which subset of anomalies out of their universe of evidence and identified LFBC anomalies (MRC, typographic or other) have been explained/replicated by NBC.

Nor are they going to reveal what additional evidence CCP has to support an alternate birth location and birth narrative quite apart from the LFBC. CCP is intimating strongly that this additional as yet unreleased evidence provides conclusive proof of LFBC forgery.

Given recent revelation of Barry’s abuse of the IRS to attack the Tea Party and abuse of the FBI to spy on journalists and the ability of NSA to spy on any of Barry’s enemies at will combined with some horrific suspicious deaths, Zullo and CCP appear to have gotten the message in the past few weeks that they need to stop blabbing about who they are trying to enlist to support a congressional investigation.

Barry’s minions have $$ millions of dollars and vicious operatives who can find out who is talking to CCP and try to crush them preemptively.


790 posted on 08/26/2013 9:18:51 AM PDT by Seizethecarp (Defend aircraft from "runway kill zone" mini-drone helicopter swarm attacks: www.runwaykillzone.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies ]


To: Seizethecarp

“Zullo, Gillar and Gallups have all explicitly stated that NBC’s claims to date are NOT 100% EXCULPATORY.”

Zullo, Gillar and Gallups also explicitly stated that the digital artifacts on the PDF could not be caused by simply scanning a document into a computer.

If their experts were wrong about that, what else were they wrong about?


791 posted on 08/26/2013 9:49:53 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp
Nor are they going to reveal what additional evidence CCP has to support an alternate birth location and birth narrative quite apart from the LFBC. CCP is intimating strongly that this additional as yet unreleased evidence provides conclusive proof of LFBC forgery.

The only way you can make that statement above is if you have his genuine LFBC and it does not match any information on the one released.

792 posted on 08/26/2013 10:02:11 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

To: Seizethecarp; LucyT; GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; Fantasywriter; GregNH; Kenny Bunk; ml/nj; ...
No one on our side should be wasting too much time with whatever legitimacy which NBC and his fellow Obama defenders are trying to claim about the purported LFBC posted on the White House web site back in 2011.

The CCP already has an affidavit from a Certified Document Examiner who has previously done work for Obama lawyer Bob Bauer (in all likelihood a Democrat himself), saying that he is certain that it is a forgery. That alone should trump any propaganda from them.

799 posted on 08/26/2013 3:26:57 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 790 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson