Per justiceseeker93:
“The important point by Zullo is that that NBC and his fellow Obama defenders haven’t come close to exculpating the fraudsters who did the purported Obama LFBC displayed in 2011 over the White House web site, even if their allegations about the Xerox 7655’s capabilities are valid.”
I agree. Even if NBC’s research into Xerox replication are true “it is of no concern” is the subtext of the message I get from Gallups and Zullo.
NBC could be completely correct about the Xerox, but the “disinformation” by most Fogblowers (not NBC, BTW) is that this Xerox anomaly replication throws out the rest of CCP’s investigation showing that the pdf CONTENT is still forged forged. That false conclusion is the disinformation, not the premise that NBC has identified Xerox MRC software replication.
Gallups and Zullo don’t refute NBC’s findings, they only stress that the findings are “of no concern” on the context of the entire investigation and are not EXCULPATORY. Zullo is not going to “play 20 questions” with Obots that would reveal what forensic evidence BEYOND the Xerox claims STILL point to criminal forgery.
Unlike Barry who has no excuse for pervasive lack of transparency, this being a criminal investigation the CCP has every reason NOT to be transparent with Obots or eligibility activists (”birthers”).
When Zullo and the CCP say “trust us” I find them to be worthy of my trust until proven otherwise, unlike Barry and the Fogblowers who lie all day every day to protect continuing lack of transparency regarding Barry’s identity documents.
Poster John over at ‘Obama Release Your Records’ wrote:
[ATTENTION! It appears the Obot’s theory that Xerox WorkCenter is the “forger” of Obama’s Birth Certificate PDF is FLAWED. The Obots failed to use the right workflow in determining their findings which has apparently lead to unreliable results. This is because they used the wrong printing process workflow. While the CCP took steps to insure that their scanning experiments were based on an ACTUAL original hard copy birth certificate, the Obots essentially did a “scan of scan”. There really be no comparision to what CCP VS. what the Obots did.]
And this
[The CCP took very careful steps to insure that replication experiments reflected that of a “real” Hawaii Birth Certificate. To that end, they made sure that for scanning process, the green background, the date stamp and other elements were “real” constructions. The Obots instead did a scan of a scan. The green background, the date stamp and other elements weren’t “real” but computer generated constructions. Susquently, there is no comparsion of the results the CCP got VS. what Obots got. The CCP’s real holy grail in now Miki Booth’s and friends original hard copy birth certificate from Hawaii. To further strengthen their findings, the CCP needs to scan these birth certificates preferely on a Xerox and observe their findings. Remember, these birth certificate are “real” in every way when scanned by the machine and will interpretated as such. Meaning, the green background, the stamps and all other elements will “real” constructions scanned by the machine rather than “computer generated” reproductions scanned by the computer.]