If MRC is the "industry standard" that goes back to 1999, and is only the reason for the errors and anomalies, then other makes and models made by other companies should show the same errors as the Xerox 7655.
“If MRC is the ‘industry standard’ that goes back to 1999, and is only the reason for the errors and anomalies, then other makes and models made by other companies should show the same errors as the Xerox 7655.”
Based on the 6 and 8 substitution problem there appears to be an implementation of the MRC issue with Xerox WorkCenter that might not be present to the same extent with other manufacturers.
The goal of compression is to reduce file size but the trade-off is accuracy of the image. Without compression, the white-space on copies would be saved at the default bit-map resolution creating a huge file. The Xerox default “Normal” setting is the one that actually has the machine warn the user that the image may be defective, i.e. an approximate simulation rather than a copy.
At least one of Obama’s tax returns was done on a Konica Minolta bizhub 352. It appears to have similar layers as the tax returns done on the Xerox. In the comments of this link.
http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2013/07/31/wh-lfbc-timeline/