There is no point in being civil to you. You are intellectually dishonest, therefore the best recourse to you is other than civil.
I personally think you WORK for some Republican Pol, to whom this is a nasty issue, (Rubio perhaps?) and you are both doing your job, and putting forth your own rationalized opinion at the same time.
It is the only explanation of which I have managed to contemplate so far for why a supposed conservative would work so very hard propping up our Nazi Dictator tyrant. This issue is important to you because it's personal somehow. (and your arguments reflect that's it's Personal.) It affects someone of interest to you in the same manner that it affects Obama, so the legitimacy of someone of interest to you is tantamount to Obama's legitimacy.
You argue from emotion. Not logic. Not facts.
And yet you can't show one single thing I've ever said that was "intellectually dishonest."
And I've just pointed out how you base your case from early America on a total of two of the weakest, most invalid, most disputed authorities available, while ignoring or making excuses for not accepting the word of dozens of REAL authorities, including Founders, Framers, Supreme Court Justices, early legal experts, and so on.
Odd, that.