Every single thing I've ever posted here was absolutely true, unless an honest mistake (not often, but I'm sure it's happened), in which case I've promptly acknowledged and corrected it and not repeated the claim.
Far, far unlike you.
And that's part of the LIE! It's not that what you post isn't true, it's that you deceptively claim IT SUPPORTS YOUR ARGUMENT WHEN IT DOES NOT!
Again, your quoting of the opinion of the Marquee de Lafayette's Aide, is an example of this. Why on God's earth would you regard the French Aide of a French National as a SOURCE on the meaning of Article II "natural born citizen?" He was neither a delegate, a representative, a founder, or even a Judge, yet you keep CITING that silly bastard as proof that you are right! And then there's that SPANISH guy you keep citing! Again, no delegate, no Representative, no Judge, and no founder, yet you cite him anyway! And these are just two examples among many ( I could probably come up with a dozen examples of you doing this.) of you misrepresenting someone as a knowledgeable source, or misrepresenting their meaning as supporting you.
unless an honest mistake (not often, but I'm sure it's happened), in which case I've promptly acknowledged and corrected it and not repeated the claim.
You are either deluded, or a pathological liar, who happens to believe his own lies. Given how artfully you have truncated quotes so as to change their meaning, I'm voting for Deliberate and knowing liar.