So bold-facing the point and pinging you to it in post 245 wasn't enough?
In fact, it's been clearly pointed out to you on previous occasions that your Roberts claims were false.
For example, I pointed that out, very clearly, on April 20, 2013. The post was addressed directly to you, in a thread in which you were very active.
I suppose bold-facing the point and making the text red wasn't enough to catch your attention then, either?
I pointed out again that the Roberts claims were false on May 30th - a post which you obviously read, as you replied to it.
So you clearly knew the Roberts claims were false, and have no rebuttal to the point, but you continue to post them anyway.
Jim, do we have to put up with a poster who keeps posting claims that are known to be false?
Pretty much if it has your name attached, it’s unlikely to be taken seriously.