Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

Why wouldn’t Zimmerman benefit from taking the stand himself; I know the defense normally puts the accused on the stand only when there is no recourse, but it seems to me he would benefit from taking the stand. He is attractive, articulate, and has a consistent story.


70 posted on 06/29/2013 4:29:28 PM PDT by Theodore R. ("Hey, the American people must all be crazy out there!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Theodore R.
Why wouldn’t Zimmerman benefit from taking the stand himself; I know the defense normally puts the accused on the stand only when there is no recourse, but it seems to me he would benefit from taking the stand. He is attractive, articulate, and has a consistent story.

As I said, when the the defense is decisively winning the case, you don't take any chances no matter how small. Don't give the prosecution any chances or openings to trip up the defended.

73 posted on 06/29/2013 4:36:46 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Theodore R.

Furthermore, for example, the Florida Casey Anthony trial. The prosecution had a very strong circumstantial case against Anthony, however, the defense did not feel the state’s case against Anthony was strong enough for her to take the stand. Anthony never did and she won. Taking the stand for defendants in murder trials can be a high risk move.


76 posted on 06/29/2013 4:43:55 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson