I did another advanced google on “obado duplicate mae” and got this post by butterdezillion:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2694698/replies?c=7
To: driftdiver
There are ways of seeing for sure whether a record is authentic, and it’s not just by looking at the physical piece of paper. There has to be the matching computer transaction log.
For instance, right now if the Passport Office coughed up copies of Obama’s passport documents they might look legitimate. But even the Department of State says they cannot guarantee that the documents they would print out are genuine, because they don’t know whether the 3 breaches of Obama’s passport file in 2008 resulted in any of the file being ALTERED. They can find that out. They can look at the computer records and find out not only that the file was accessed but what, if anything, was DONE to the file. That would be very critical to know, if Obama ever wanted to use that passport.
And if anybody wanted to know whether Obama is a US citizen right now it would be important for them to look at his passport as well as any other citizenship records he might have. If there was a court case where a person could get discovery of all of Obama’s birth and citizenship records, including the embedded logs and transaction history, that person would be able to find out what, if anything, was changed in Obama’s passport record, what the history of his citizenship was - when he got his first passport and under what country, etc. Every record that has been entered into a computer system would have a date of origination and a history of what happened to the record since it was created.
If we looked at what has happened to the Hawaii birth record for Mae Obado we would probably find that she had an original record that was entered into the system whenever they converted to electronic database. We would probably find that a duplicate record was created for her sometime maybe in March of 2010. The database immediately marked it as a duplicate so that the entry for that became “Obado, Duplicate Mae” - unbeknownst to whoever created the duplicate. Whoever created the duplicate immediately changed Mae Obado’s name to Barack Hussein Obama II, not realizing that the record he/she had just created was NOT still called “Obado, Mae” in the database but was now “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” so what was changed to Obama was the ORIGINAL record for Mae Obado, leaving for Mae Obado only the “Obado, DUPLICATE Mae” record. The end result is that a printout would show “Obado, Duplicate Mae”, followed next in line by “Obama, Barack Hussein II” - since the original record for Mae Obado was altered to say Barack Hussein Obama II.
The duplicate record for Mae Obado when there isn’t any original record for Mae Obado gives away that the original record was altered after a duplicate was created for her.
And that’s exactly what the HDOH had in their (supposed) 1960-64 birth index book as of sometime after March, 2010.
(This kind of sloppy work shows up in regards to the alleged birth announcements for Obama as well.)
If we looked up the history for the BC# that Obama has on the Factcheck COLB we would probably find that it originated in 1961 under a different name. We would be able to find out who that BC# originally belonged to. We would be able to find out when the name associated with that BC# was altered and by whom.
See, if a person has access to the embedded records they can find out the truth. That is why Obama NEEDS the courts to say his records are nobody’s business - to keep them from being able to get discovery.
And the Soros thugs were so desperate to make sure that the judges would never allow “standing” in court so discovery could be granted, that they made some kind of threat to at least Judge Surick - as evidenced by the fact that Surick received his “decision” saying Phil Berg had no standing from somebody by fax and he forwarded it to Berg as if it was his own ruling. That is known because when Surick forwarded the “decision” to Berg it still had on it the original date/time stamp from when Surick received the original fax. The automatic features of forwarding a fax revealed what had happened; that stamp is on every page of that forwarded “decision”. See http://james4america.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/judge-surrick-received-the-decision-he-issued/
So we ALREADY have evidence of big-time crimes being committed by government officials to cover up for Obama. The evidence already exists; it’s too late for Obama to put the genie back in the bottle.
We just can’t find anybody in the media, law enforcement, courts, or state or federal legislatures who will do anything about it. And THAT is the real story of Obama’s eligibility issue.
When we find out why Judge Surick allowed somebody else to write his decision for him, we will probably be well on our way to understanding why EVERYBODY within government, media, law enforcement, and the courts has bent over backwards - even to the point of creating forgeries and breaking laws - to cover for Obama. When we know what threat they used on all these judges, etc it will tell us who is holding America’s entire infrastructure hostage today.
7 posted on 03/25/2011 2:50:11 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
I have an interesting theory about that...
MAE = MEAN ABSOLUTE ERROR.
Go back to the Virginia Sunahara story, born August 4, died August 5. On the 29th of August, her death certificate shows an amended birth certificate for Virginia, amended apparently to correct her name from Tomyio (the name of her father) to Virginia...and the certificate number reflects the date of the amendment...it's 400+ births past her actual date of birth:
Now, tell me, what happened to the original certificate for Tomiyo Sunahara? Was that number cancelled? Is there a blank where that entry should be? YOU DON'T AMEND SOMETHING THAT NEVER EXISTED...IMO.
And what would happen if the birth listed on the index for Barack Hussein Obama 11 fell within the 1960-1964 period of the index, but the actual date of birth was in January?
The index would then print out TWO entries for the same name...and we can't have that...so one of them becomes a MEAN ABSOLUTE ERROR.