[Fred Nerks]

Stanley Armour, if that's really him, and it does appear to be...is standing there with a bunch of what look like Union workers, a few people who resemble some of the guests at the Nachmanoffs from 1961, (only they look somewhat older) and an asian woman who we have identified as a graduate from the U of HI in 1959, and she also looks older than her graduation photo. (From the U of HI YearbOok, access to which you need to pay and join up) There's no way of knowing who the central character is.

BUT IT IS HIS FACE. ONLY HIS FACE IS FROM THE AIRPORT IMAGE OF 1970/71. SO STOP USING THAT IMAGE AS AN EXAMPLE OF STANLEY ARMOUR BEING ANYWHERE NEAR THE KENYAN AFRICAN-NEGRO. IT'S TOTALLY WORTHLESS.

So even if it was the kenyan you were looking at in that image, it would be from THE 1970-1971 VISIT. And the five coloured men are evidentially Captain, Officer and three crew.

[edge919]

Why are you ignoring what I’m actually writing?? I’m addressing the false excuse about there being some sort of stigma that Dunham was avoiding. It doesn’t matter if Barack Sr’s face was photoshopped onto the picture. If Dunham was worried about a social stigma, he wouldn’t be in the picture at all. Why stand directly behind so-called “Union workers” for a photograph?? And why would they be in the photograph if they’re just workers??