Except that we have a Natality Report from 1961 that shows how such births were actually classified. That report uses classifications that are not reflected by the alleged coding manual. That's a problem that YOU cannot get around. You can bleep and blurt all you want about an alleged coding manual, but the report shows that the manual was irrelevant.
No, it is a FACT, JACK, that ALL of the births recorded in the same year were recorded using the SAME SPECIFICATIONS.
You or anyone else can LOOK IT UP.
And you keep making this assertion. I've asked you to prove it.
You don't. You keep asserting it as a fact, without any proof or evidence whatsoever.
IF YOU HAVE THIS SUPPOSED NATALITY REPORT, THEN PRODUCE IT.
Otherwise, it's just more BS from another stupid birther.
“That report uses classifications that are not reflected by the alleged coding manual.”
From the 1961 Natality Report,
“Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for
vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian
(combined), and “other nonwhite.”
Page 5-7
http://www.nber.org/vital-stats-books/vsus_1961_1.pdf
Table from the Coding and Punching Geographic and Personal Particulars for Births Occurring in 1961
White (includes Mexican, Puerto Rican, and all other Caucasian) -———————1
Negro ——————————2
Indian (includes American and Alaskan Indians) -—3
Chinese —————————4
Japanese—————————5
Aleut-——————————6
Eskimo-—————————7
Filipino—————————8
Other nonwhite——————9
Hawaiian-————————0
Part-Hawaiian-——————V
From the Division of Data Processing, Vital Statistics Programming Branch, Tape File Information, 1960-1961 Natality Tape Files for the United States
Race of Child
1…...White
2…...Negro
3…...Indian
4…...Chinese
5…...Japanese
6…...Aleut
7…...Eskimo
8…...Filipino
9…...Other nonwhite
0......Hawaiian
V… . Part Hawaiian
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/FOIA-DHHS-11-00673.pdf
On all of the manuals and the annual report there is no entry for “not stated”.
In the annual report it says - “In 1961 there were 4,268,326 live births registered in the United States representing an increase of less than 1 percent over the number of births in 1960.” page 1-3
Obviously, this statement could only be made after December 31, 1961.