Replies

If the conspiracy is as big & powerful as purported, you’d think (1) their photoshoppers wd either be unneeded or less incompetent, & (2) they’d have thought to teach Obama how many states there are. The German spies were able to master that simple fact; why not a candidate 50 yrs in the making?

Exactly. Obama is more the product of Luck, plain old criminal/unethical behavior, and the fact that people in Media get orgasms when they think about having a "Black" President.

Obama is an unethical fool who just happened to wander in at the right time, and with just enough talent for gab that the Media, Using every trick of which they could think, managed to pass him off as something other than an idiot.

Obama is Forrest Gump.

He is Chance Gardner.

He is Agent Double ought, Jethro Bodine.

He is Mr. Magoo.

He is Maxwell Smart.

He is Inspector Clouseau.

He is a bumbling fool who just happened to be in the right place at the right time. He is NOT the product of a long running International plan to put a puppet into a position of national importance. He is simply someone who is good at keeping gullible people from figuring out he's a fool, and part of the reason for this is that Liberals are racists and won't apply normal intellectual standards to their "Black" Messiah. To them, his idiocy is as unseeable as the emperor's new clothes.

Lol. He really is a lot like Jethro Bodine, isn’t he? He says HI is in Asia, & not one of his racist enablers utters a peep. If a conservative said Austrians spoke Austrian, it wd be news. Imagine a conservative thinking Arab is spoken in Afghanistan.

But getting back to photoshop. If Obama is the product of a grand conspiracy, why cd the appropriate photos not have been snapped in real time? Of if photoshopping was necessary, was it considered a plus to do it in a hopelessly amateurish manner? Many of the same people who love to expose the manifold photoshop errors also push the vast conspiracy theory. But can we credibly believe a conspiracy this large cannot afford to hire even one truly first rate photoshopper?

For example, how hard wd it have been to lighten SADO’s fist in that one image? It wouldn’t take a genius to see that it’s several shades too dark. & we’re to understand there was no believable fix for the ‘floating hand’ over Obama’s shoulder, in the NYC pic?

There’s a Sherlock Holmes mystery in which Holmes says to Watson ‘Don’t you see that you alternately give [the young man] credit for having too much imagination and too little?’

This is the problem w the vast conspiracy. They get credit for being so big & powerful that they had Obama singled out for POTUS from an early age...yet they can’t even manage a decent photoshop, or teach Obama a number as simple as ‘50’.

well, he is no fool, though he is ignorant and a fascist/racist at heart. He is a drug-addled bastard child of a High School girl in a casual sex relationship. He is a Canadian by birth and an Indonesian by choice, having used his Indonesian citizenship to obtain foreign student monies and favors for College. He was placed in the White House over hillahag because the Clintons were about to expose his ineligibility and the democrap party would have been soundly defeated the House, Senate, and White House without the black vote they depend upon only at election times.

Little steven barnard dunham bastard boy is not a recipient of luck. Rather he was/is the right racial mix with the right fascist mindset to afford the democrips their continued and possibly final empowerment, and he agrees with their belief system even down to the slaughter of alive unborn and just born children as an empowerment scheme. Put another way, he is the ideal human under demonic influence, to suit the democrips' puppet masters. As such he is the most destructive head of state in the nation's History and may end up being the last one, too.

So if Zero just bumbeled and tripped his way into the presidency, why all the incredibly convoluted lies, distortions, hidden/sealed/scrubbed and FORGED documents, hmmmm?

Any why did Ayers write a mythical backsrtory touted as an autobiography many years ago?

Your thesis does not hold water. Also your obsession that SAD MUST be the mother is also...odd. I’ve seen not an iota of third party witnesses or documentation other than her assertion that she’s the mother and that’s it, and I think one suspect INS document. Other than that - nada, not a blessed bit of evidence. Just a heckuva lot of mythology.

People were even having conniptions about Gilbert’s mockmentary being true! IMHO anyone who clung to that even when it so many fabrications were proven may have some kinds of reasons for clinging to the SAD is the mother story.

The best way to know the facts are to empty one’s mind of pre-conceptions, and start from scratch, looking at all evidence, not assuming “this can’t be true so I won’t even look at it”.