Replies

That would make sense, if the media has to now cover for Obama being eligible even if he was born out of the country.

To me it looks like the media may be trying to argue for Cruz being eligible. Why might they need to do this? IF the evidence that is going to come out in AL case shows that Obama was actually born outside of the US, then the media want's the public to have the perception that it still doesn't matter. 'Hey... Ted Cruz is eligible, and so it Obama'. If the public accepts the idea that NBC equates to 'Citizen at Birth', then they will argue that it doesn't matter where he was born. They will also probably argue that he was always told he was born in Hawaii, and he doesn't know anything about the BC being forged.

And it might work. Most of Obama's supporters will stand by him even if it is shown he was not born in Hawaii. They will accept the 'Citizen at Birth' (yes I know SAD was not old enough to convey US citizenship) definition. Why? Because they want to.

If that is the definition, and there are many on FR to accept it, I'm trying to get an answer from one of those if Cruz is a US NBC, and a Canadian NBC?

“To me it looks like the media may be trying to argue for Cruz being eligible. Why might they need to do this? IF the evidence that is going to come out in AL case shows that Obama was actually born outside of the US, then the media want’s the public to have the perception that it still doesn’t matter. ‘Hey... Ted Cruz is eligible, and so it Obama’.”

Sure looks like that to me. Them playing the tape of Arpaio declaring the BC to be a fake followed by saying Kenya birth OK shows they are concerned that Arpaio’s Posse is closing on the “person or persons” who forged the BC and whoever “knew or should have known” that it was forged (like Barry and Pelosi).

>>I’m trying to get an answer from one of those if Cruz is a US NBC, and a Canadian NBC? <<

That could be an interesting question!