“Obama Sr had a wife in Kenya “Kezia” or something like that
she had at least 1 child before he left for the US
He left in 1959 so a 1961 son would not be hers..”
A son in 1961 might well be hers (Kezia’s) and he might also be LEGALLY his (BHO Sr.), because she was his legal Kenyan wife at the time. See this story:
http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/11/14/obama-mystery-theater-kezias-baby/
Dr. Eowyn makes a very good point: If BHO the elder had acknowledged the birth of a US citizen son to the INS, that “anchor baby” would be his ticket to stay in the USA. Why didn’t he use that son as an argument against his own deportation, several years later, when he was kicked out of the USA? Barry was supposed to be living in Hawaii at the time, with his mother. Even though they were estranged, his “son” was still his son, wasn’t he?
Correction: Dr. Eowyn was quoting Dan Crosby, with regard to how “acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.”
My point is that Kezia is reported to have been pregnant in 1961, even though her husband was in the USA. It’s the reason why BHO Sr. said he divorced her. What became of that child?
Greenperson,
Per the foia’ed INA docs for bho SR , the ina was starting to ask about the wife (kezia) back in Kenya.
If I recall correctly, the ina at the time was concerned about “good moral character “.
“,.......Dr. Eowyn makes a very good point: If BHO the elder had acknowledged the birth of a US citizen son to the INS,that “anchor baby” would be his ticket to stay in the USA. Why didn’t he use that son as an argument against his own deportation,several years later,when he was kicked out of the USA? Barry was supposed to be living in Hawaii at the time,with his mother. Even though they were estranged,his “son” was still his son,wasn’t he?”