You are the one that stated there were none.
My position is philosophical: If not attacked then no war.
You are entitled to believe that; and have stated that- but your belief has nothing to do with whether or not certain things are or not happening or have happened.
Im not getting involved in did he or didnt he have WMDs.
Then why did you already involve yourself by stating there were no WMDs in Iraq?
The soviets once had 10,000 nukes pointed at US cities but Russia or its satellites states were not invaded.
Yes I lived through the Cold War and do remember it, whether or not we should have or should not have invaded Russia has nothing to do with the issues in Syria. Believe me Syria is not comparable to the Russia of Cold War days.
I think it’s pretty pointless as evidenced by this thread to get involved in the “did or didnt he” debate about WMDs when my position is strictly philosophical i.e im reluctant to go to war unless explicitly attacked.