No. The only parts that are handwritten are the signatures and the dates next to them, which would always be handwritten and wouldn’t provide a strong reason to point that out. And with Gov. Abercrombie saying the record was “written down” ... one would expect to see other fields on the document be handwritten. Too bad nobody in the press ever followed up for an explanation from either of those two.
It’s only crazy, conspiracy-driven birthers who ask such obvious questions.s/
I believe there’s something on record, but what it is, they cannot afford to show us. I suspect the child on the birth index for 1960-1964 wasn’t born in August 1961, and his mother’s name wasn’t Stanley Ann Dunham.