Yet, the fact that, if true, a crime of forgery was committed, obligates the Judge to refer that for criminal prosecution. The failure of the DoJ to clear this up, in the interest of the People of the United States, instead of clumsy cover-ups to hide any potential question of criminal acts, flies in the face of justice. The same thing goes with the SSN, both now and in every previous case that these issues have been raised.
It is, literally, treason. One must consider that any person who allegedly would take action to usurp the office of PoTUS to be an enemy of the USA. That person, and every other person who aids and abets that act, are guilty of Treason.
“Yet, the fact that, if true, a crime of forgery was committed, obligates the Judge to refer that for criminal prosecution.”
Unfortunately, this will not be an evidentiary hearing to assess any claims of proof of a crime. It concerns only the five points the judge listed.
Bottom line: Was this case “over” (can a federal court intervene) AFTER Barry was inaugurated yet again?
Only if Dr. Taitz can persuade the judge that the court still has jurisdiction and her plaintiff has standing could the case move on to discovery and trial on the merits.