Posted on 04/08/2013 7:14:00 AM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
“We are not getting rid of Obama because he is Constitutionally Ineligible. Neither will he be impeached for document fraud.”
That is the best bet, given the unlimited $$ and thuggery available to Barry’s team.
However, when I listened to Carl Gallups and Mike Zullo’s account of their meetings in DC surrounding CPAC event and the radio show last week there are two things that give me hope:
1. They said that “VIPs” looked at the Posse evidence for the first time and were shocked to see that evidence of forgery is overwhelming including verification of forgery by a certified forensic document lab.
2. Zullo said that new 100% damning evidence to back up the fraud was just uncovered last week!
The CCP members are making no money off of this and they are being subjected to excruciating levels of grief by Barry’s minions at DOJ and in the MSM who “know where they live” and monitor everything they do. Yet Arpaio and the Posse persist.
I find Zullo’s claim that he can’t reveal more at this time due to it being an ongoing criminal investigation to be completely persuasive under the circumstances.
So I am not prepared to become defeatist and discouraged at this late date when people that I trust say that State AGs and congressmen are likely in the mix along with some media personalities. That is enough to give me hope!
BTW, I was very sorry to see this story about Bowdoin College which might be of interest if you haven’t seen it:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324100904578404502145771288.html
“The Golf Shot Heard Round the Academic World”
“The tale of a teed-off philanthropist and the head of Bowdoin College, where identity politics runs wild.”
The ‘guardians’ of liberty have looked into the eyes of Medusa and are become relics of crumbling stone. Deaf, blind, and mute. What we need are sledgehammers and Patriots with the strength and courage to wield them.
Well said!
This WildHighlander is with you!
...
I find Zullos claim that he cant reveal more at this time due to it being an ongoing criminal investigation to be completely persuasive under the circumstances.
If Zullo has got the no s*#! poop on Obama, waiting longer is not a problem these days after 5 years of this.
“Im adopted. Ive been told I was born in Bham, al. Course, I have no idea. I know that is what my birth certificate says. It also says my adopted parents are my birth parents. Im pretty sure thats not right, LOL. For all I know I may not be a natural born citizen.”
Look at the bottom of your birth certificate and you’ll see “date filed” with a date. This means there was a adjudication in Court on the adoption. The Court ordered the BC to be “filed”.
In Alabama, like Hawaii, adult adoptees can obtain a copy of their original long form BC. The copy will be marked with the words, “NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT,” because it can only be used for historical reference. When the adoption was finalized, the Court ordered the original to be sealed and archived. In the eyes of the Court, the original does not exist and never existed.
At the bottom of the original, you’ll see “date accepted” and then the date the vital statistics were accepted by the registrar. Your birth mother, delivery doctor, and hospital administrator signed an attestion on the document swearing the data submitted to the registrar is true and correct. The registrar accepted the attestation, created the original BC and filed it.
The fact your original was sealed and archived is evidence of an adoption. The fact the original was sealed and archived is evidence of adoption. Most people don’t understand this and incorrectly assume it doesn’t make a difference if the registrar “filed” or “accepted” the vital statistics. Not true! There’s a big difference.
It’s rare, but some adoptions are annulled. When an adoption is annulled, the BC with the adoptee parent(s) are stripped of their paternity and the rights of the birth parent(s) are restored. Generally, the original is unsealed and restored.
In Obama’s case, his mother testified in 1971 she lied in her attestion of the birth statistics in 1961. She testified in 1971 BHO Sr. was not the birth father. The Judge in the Hawaii Family Court heard testimony and examined evidence to conclude BHO Sr. was the birth father. The original BC was not unsealed because it contains an attestation by the birth mother that she withdrew 10 years later. Consequently, the Court ordered the Hawaii registrar to file a COLB with Barack Hussein Obama Sr., African, as the birth father.
And the man who wasn't his father had no wife and no children in 1959 and lost two years when he was buried.
I see that Brian Hicks has been banned as the result of posting the link you asked for.
The bull is through the gate anyway:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/barack-hussein-obama-british-passport.html
I posted an image of the kenyan’s passport, so I guess I’m next. Been nice to know ya.
I guess the good news is that his web site is unreadable.
Professor Michael Ikua Muiga who was the Policy Staff Member of President Barack Obama, re-election campaign 2012
Yes. The monies are meant as compensation for the child's normal existance expense, not for profit.
Bgill, justiceseeker
Looks like what y’all have experience with, in regard to it being local or state interaction with the church organization (no profit involved too) would debunk the theory about the feds interacting with church org back around 1970s.
Say Fred, that bar looks interesting. How about letting me shout you a tube of the frosty amber fluid?
“I posted an image of the kenyans passport, so I guess Im next. Been nice to know ya.”
Not to worry. FYI, “Brian Hicks” is an alias that has been frequently used by Lucas Smith while making posts on several eligibility blogs...including his own, IIRC.
Brian Hicks was zotted for BEING the previously zotted Lucas Smith, not for posting Srs passport.
Steady Carp, you’re losing me on the turns.
“In Obamas case, his mother testified in 1971 she lied in her attestion of the birth statistics in 1961. She testified in 1971 BHO Sr. was not the birth father. The Judge in the Hawaii Family Court heard testimony and examined evidence to conclude BHO Sr. was the birth father. The original BC was not unsealed because it contains an attestation by the birth mother that she withdrew 10 years later. Consequently, the Court ordered the Hawaii registrar to file a COLB with Barack Hussein Obama Sr., African, as the birth father.”
SvenMagnussen has “jumped the shark” (again) with the above post. Using his magical powers of “remote viewing” Sven has revealed how the word “African” came to be on Barry’s (obviously forged) LFBC pdf image...in 1971.
So contemporaneously with BHO Sr.’s HI trip where Stanley Ann and Barry are in photos fawning over Sr. at Christmas, SvenMagnussen has knowledge (somehow) that Stanley Ann was in court declaring that Sr. was not Barry’s actual dad, but she failed to persuade the judge because the judge “heard testimony and examined evidence to conclude BHO Sr. was the birth father.”
In the back of what's left of my mind I have always thought that one of the many fall-back positions of Team Obama was going to be something like,
Perhaps Sven's role in all of this is to prepare the way for this argument in case it's needed. Even if it's not needed, it makes a nice bit of creative obfuscation, which is exactly what Team Obama has in mind for this phase of the hoax.
Can we stop playing their game now and concentrate on the midterms of 2014? If the Mombasa MF gets the House and the Senate, we'll be living through a re-run of Stalin's first Five-Year Plan.
Sven has repeatedly explained his knowledge and the mechanics of what should and could be done
.. Carp is playin games
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.