Posted on 04/05/2013 9:15:38 AM PDT by butterdezillion
Okay, let’s say I believe you. So to make what I read true, somebody on ObamaConspiracy observed the exchange between you & the Freeper in question. He/she thought you were doing such a good job, he/she decided to take credit for it. So he/she bragged about the exchange on OC, & then posted a link that actually led not to something w which he/she was personally involved, but rather to the give-&-take between you, LL, & the party in question.
I suppose this could have happened, but it seems a bit of a stretch. Fwiw.
I have no idea what you read. I have never posted on (or even visited) Obama Conspiracy. Believe what you want.
“Believe what you want.”
You felt the need to give me permission?
Well since I don’t know you well enough to know how honest you are, I’ll believe what I saw w my own eyes.
Going back to your prior reply. How on earth can you brag about making correct predictions on eligibility threads? That’s like saying you predicted the outcome of loaded dice. The court system is overwhelmingly liberal—something conservatives learned decades ago. We expect nothing from it but a periodic swift kick in the teeth, & it never fails to deliver.
& then there’s this gem:
“I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.”
Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care. It means the man is a fraud. Liberals may like fellow liberals, but not even they like complete frauds. It’s human nature to dislike a con artist. Even if one temporarily suits your purpose, underneath it all you feel disgust.
Yet all you care about is whether a blatantly faked draft card will Obama kicked out of office. Really. What a weird, hinky reaction. If that was my response to the worst forgery on record, I wouldn’t put it out there in the public eye. I’d think it, but at least have the good sense not to post it.
Orly Taitz now has two eligibility cases pending before judges appointed by Ronald Reagan. Those cases will be dismissed, not because those judges are liberals or because the cases are fixed, but because of well-settled principles of law, including standing, mootness and the political question doctrine.
& then there’s this gem: “I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.” Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care.
Apparently, reading comprehension is not your strong suit (odd, for someone who claims to be a writer). I never said I didn't care if his Selective Service registration is forged; I said I don't post about it because it is outside my expertise as a lawyer. On the eligibility threads (and most threads, for that matter), I post about legal issues because my professional background gives me something to add to the discussion.
Only a liberal believes court cases today are decided on the law. Conservatives have seen for decades now that ideology trumps all else. Maybe if you had caught me twenty years ago you might be able to make me believe the outrageous lie that judges decide cases on merits. Even then I would have been skeptical. Today it just makes me wonder. Do you even believe this stuff yourself???
“& then there’s this gem: “I have no idea if Obama’s draft registration is OK or not; I am not a forensic document examiner, and I have never posted any comment on that issue one way or another. I do know that any discrepancy in the draft records of a sitting President is not something that gives any U.S. court jurisdiction to remove the President from office.” Did you actually type that? If so, does the plaque on your door read ‘CA DNC’? Because otherwise it makes no sense. A human being cares that Obama’s draft registration is a complete & glaring fake. You don’t even have to be a conservative to care.
Apparently, reading comprehension is not your strong suit (odd, for someone who claims to be a writer). I never said I didn’t care if his Selective Service registration is forged; I said I don’t post about it because it is outside my expertise as a lawyer. On the eligibility threads (and most threads, for that matter), I post about legal issues because my professional background gives me something to add to the discussion.”
So now it is ‘reading comprehension’ not to see that you meant the opposite of what you said? I.e.: to see how much you care about Obama’s lying, cheating, forging, law-breaking ways when all you actually said was that he’d be in no legal jeopardy.
Your definition of reading comprehension: mind-reading. (If in fact anything of that sort [i.e.: concern about Obama’s fundamental lack of integrity] was actually in your mind to begin w—& there’s no indication it was.
You want credit for things you didn’t say & never said or even suggested. Worse, you blame me for not knowing about all these things you didn’t say & have never said. That is sick. Really, really sick.
obumpa
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.