Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge

See this portion of post #51, my point in quoting the part 7) in the ins rule was to show that there was a difference between “native-born citizen” and “natural -born citizen” .

.”..and restore the status of native-born or natural-born citizen (whichever existed prior to the loss) as of the date citizenship was reacquired.”

What category of citizenship existed for a man , but not for a woman (or vice versa )?


66 posted on 04/02/2013 11:47:16 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57

Prior to the Nineteenth, citizenship for women!= citizenship for men, the two had distinct legal structures and status.

After the Nineteenth - this was eliminated. The document you’ve uncovered concerns a very specific class of American citizen - American women who married and lived abroad, and were married to non American citizens who would be considered aliens.

It also mentions what to do about American women married to those who were not eligible for immigration privileges (due to race restrictions), and how after the war - all of them were offered to restore their citizenship when they returned to the United States.

Your document does not contain:

1, your interpretation of the law
2, any references to anyone save women

What you would need is the document which defines both terms - which this document does not provide. NBC - refers to the voting class, which back then - would not have included all women.


67 posted on 04/02/2013 11:51:20 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson