Was the case decided upon the fact that Obama meets neither the facts of the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark decision nor the 14th Amendment “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement as defined in the Congressional Record?
On what do they base their ruling exclusive of WKA or its derivatives or the 14th Amendment?
Was the case decided upon the fact that Obama meets neither the facts of the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark decision nor the 14th Amendment “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement as defined in the Congressional Record? On what do they base their ruling exclusive of WKA or its derivatives or the 14th Amendment?
I'll let 4zoltan speak to that question if he wants, since he's just read the case.