As explained to you
Prior to WKA there were two kinds of citizenship: native or natural born, and naturalized.
Subsequent to WKA this is no longer true.
Broadening the "subject to the jurisdiction" clause of the 14th Amendment to include domiciled aliens which heretofore were not "subject to the jurisdiction" created a distinction between native born citizen and natural born citizen.
"The provision is, that 'all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.' That means 'subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.' What do we mean by 'complete jurisdiction thereof?' Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means." - Sen. Trumbull, framer of 14th Amend.
The Court ignored naturalization acts and naturalized the children of domiciled aliens.
This broadened interpretation of the 14th Amendment "subject to the jurisdiction" clause naturalized the children of domiciled aliens creating a distinction where none had existed. It severed native born citizen from natural born citizen.
Early authorities that citizens born here were natural born citizens are correct. It is no longer true after WKA.
WKA didn't create a new kind of citizenship. The ruling said that the 14th Amendment affirmed the ancient rule which had always applied.
The entire PURPOSE of that Amendment was NOT to create some new kind of citizenship, but simply to ensure that the rules that had ALWAYS applied, applied to BLACK people.
And those who introduced the 14th Amendment believed that it was simply declaratory of the law as it already was.
Rawle tells us back in 1825 what the rule was:
Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.
This is the way the Amendment is understood by the Supreme Court and every competent legal authority.
Are you so obtuse that we have to go endlessly repeating the exact same things we already said?