Replies

"Ankeny v Daniels, Indiana Court of Appeals ruled unanimously: “Based on the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”—Indiana Court of Appeals, November 12, 2009
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf"

Isn't that Indiana Court decision interesting?

Especially this part, regarding:

"the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark", the state court of Indiana had stated this in the previous paragraph:

"The Court held that Mr. Wong Kim Ark was a citizen of the United States “at the time of his birth.” 14"

What does footnote 14 say?

"We note the fact that the Court in Wong Kim Ark did not actually pronounce the plaintiff a “natural born Citizen”

Hmmm. yeah. interesting.