I don’t know Jeff so I can’t speak for him but no, I don’t work for the Democrat Party. It is my personal opinion that the presidential ineligibility movement does more harm to conservative goals than good. So I oppose it.
The only case that matters TO YOU was decided in 1874. That particular case, however hasn’t mattered to any of the literally hundreds of judges who have ruled on presidential eligibility in original jurisdiction courts, state and federal appeals courts, state Supreme Courts, or among the nine Justices who sit on the U.S. Supreme Court bench.
And of course I don't either.
And I certainly agree that it's doing more harm to conservatives than good. That's one of the reasons why I oppose it as well. Others are: I just don't like people deceiving others with untrue tales, and I just don't like people trying to bend the Constitution from what it says to what they wish it would say.
That's not a conservative approach. A conservative approach respects the Constitution and accurately understands what it means.