Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
The court could have determined that Wong was natural born but they did not. They determined that he was a 14th Amend. citizen.

They CLEARLY determined he was a NATURAL BORN citizen, because the rule that they said ALWAYS applied quite clearly made him that.

You can claim the contrary all you like. But the understanding that I have enunciated here is the way the case is understood by every significant legal authority in the entire country, by every court, and by every literate reader who goes through the case carefully and does not have some birther axe to grind.

182 posted on 04/02/2013 7:14:38 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston
The holding of the United States Supreme Court in United States v Wong Kim Ark

The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

185 posted on 04/02/2013 7:36:56 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson