[Jeff Winston]

I’ve said before that I think there’s a case to be made against children of illegal aliens.

There MIGHT be a case to be made against children of persons only TEMPORARILY in the United States.

There is NO case to be made against children of immigrants. That case was decided in 1898.

[Ray76]

WKA held that a child born in the United States to domiciled alien parents was a Fourteenth Amendment “citizen of the United States.”

[Rides3]

I’ve said before that I think there’s a case to be made against children of illegal aliens. There MIGHT be a case to be made against children of persons only TEMPORARILY in the United States.

As such, there is a case against Obama. His father was only in the U.S. on a temporary student visa. The Wong Kim Ark decision was based on the agreed to fact that Ark's non-citizen parents were permanently domiciled in the U.S. at the time of his birth.

Such is not true of Obama.