Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge

“Everything in your ‘source’ mentions women and not men. And yes, back then, there were women with a different status than men.”

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 had already granted U.S. citizenship to all persons born in the United States “not subject to any foreign power.” The United States does not recognize seperate classes of citizenship unless your discussing eligibility for POTUS or VP.

U.S. Citizens who obtained their citizenship by completing the naturalization process are ineligible for POTUS because their Certificate of Naturalization could be revoked if it was obtained with fraud. Statutory citizens cannot be POTUS be their Certificate of Citizenship could be revoked if it was obtained with fraud. A natural born citizen does not have a certificate issued by a Federal agency to be revoked. Consequently, their citizenship cannot be revoked unless their action indicates, by a preponderence of the evidence, they have renounced with intent to renounce.

In all other situations, you’re either a U.S citizen or not


124 posted on 04/02/2013 4:47:25 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen

NBC concerns only those who are eligible for the presidency and able to vote, neither of which applied to women prior to ratification of the Nineteenth.


216 posted on 04/02/2013 9:23:52 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson