To: Popman
You assume it is the cartels and not the administration. That’s a stretch, these days.
5 posted on
03/31/2013 3:20:07 AM PDT by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
To: Hardraade
To: Hardraade
You assume it is the cartels and not the administration. That’s a stretch, these days.Well... you do have a point...
Absolutely nothing would surprise me today...
9 posted on
03/31/2013 3:25:09 AM PDT by
Popman
To: Hardraade
You assume it is the cartels and not the administration. That’s a stretch, these days.
*********************************************
As long as the drug cartels interests don’t conflict with the current owners of the judiciary , the bankers , things will work out fine ... welcome to Chihuahua , Texas.
15 posted on
03/31/2013 3:54:06 AM PDT by
Neidermeyer
(I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
To: Hardraade
You assume it is the cartels and not the administration. That’s a stretch, these days.IMHO it isn't too far a stretch to equate one with the other............
30 posted on
03/31/2013 4:45:23 AM PDT by
varon
(USA Nationalist)
To: Hardraade
They were all probably shot with guns the regime provided to them. I would love to follow the trail of drug money to see where it goes.
79 posted on
03/31/2013 7:33:45 AM PDT by
peeps36
(America is being destroyed by filthy traitors in the political establishment)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson