Posted on 03/19/2013 8:30:58 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
oh you don;t have to prove anything to me
no you just want drugs to be legal and a man can marry another man.
As long as their communities are self-sufficient and don't drain on the finances of the other communities (*cough* *cough* Detroit), fine.
My score from the Ideology Selector quiz:
Paleoconservative (100%)
Paleo-libertarian (87%)
Libertarian (80%)
Neoconservative (74%)
oh you don;t have to prove anything to me
Your mind's made up and you won't be confused by facts - I'm proving something to other readers of this thread.
No reply needed.
OK then address your post to All and not me if you don;t want to prove anything to me.
Still telling this lie?
You;re all over this site on nearly every thread harping on about drugs and how it doesn;t hurt anyone.
Another of your lies - I've never claimed that drugs don't hurt anyone.
no you just want drugs to be legal
So that's at least one lie you'll stop telling?
and a man can marry another man.
You're in love with this lie. Did somebody tell you lying is a conservative value?
"All" is actually just another FR account - but if you want me to no longer include you on my replies to your posts, I'm happy to comply.
nice one, All it is then and not to me...
Paleo-libertarian (100%)
Conservative (86%)
Libertarian (83%)
Paleoconservative (81%)
Centrist (77%)
Neoconservative (73%)
Left-libertarian (71%)
Third Way (52%)
Radical (15%)
Liberal (0%)
With government deciding what we "ought"? Doesn't sound conservative to me.
I'm not playing your game anymore. Total freedom leads to anarchy
I'm against anarchy and for government protecting individual liberties - anything more is statism.
No reply needed.
It was needed to clear up your red herring about "anarchy." But if you want me to no longer include you on my replies to your posts, I'm happy to comply.
As long as their communities are self-sufficient and don't drain on the finances of the other communities (*cough* *cough* Detroit), fine.
Makes sense. Detroit made itself a cesspool without legal pot or porn ... which could be a source of revenue (I suspect it would not be unknown for residents of "moral" communities to make incognito shopping trips to "immoral" communities).
Everybody is not some nun the cops can beat in the head when called by an abortionist.
The state exists to PROTECT COMMUNITIES ~ not just "the rights of individuals". For example, the Constitution's own preamble begins "We the people..." and the Bill of Rights refers to "the people" over and over and over and over.
You might have missed the subtle nuance but the US government (federal and state) do not exist to serve the personal interests of a king, or ruling class individuals who prey on the people in the name of their privileges.
With government deciding what we "ought"? Doesn't sound conservative to me.
I'm not playing your game anymore. Total freedom leads to anarchy
I'm against anarchy and for government protecting individual liberties - anything more is statism.
No reply needed.
Typical of so many libertarians, you don't want to debate the issues ~
Linda Frances is the one who wanted no reply.
just toss out some of your convoluted logic that misrepresents the natural structure of society and you're done with it.
Yes, because I threatened with physical harm anyone who dared reply to disagree with me - it's right there in my ... oh, wait a minute ...
The state exists to PROTECT COMMUNITIES ~ not just "the rights of individuals". For example, the Constitution's own preamble begins "We the people..." and the Bill of Rights refers to "the people" over and over and over and over.
"People" are individuals - no contradiction of my position there.
You might have missed the subtle nuance but the US government (federal and state) do not exist to serve the personal interests of a king, or ruling class individuals who prey on the people in the name of their privileges.
Individual rights are not "privileges" and belong to each adult (and, to a limited extent, each child). The term "ruling class" applies better to those who would violate the rights of individuals to "protect their community."
How do individuals, say, viewing porn or using drugs in the privacies of their homes thereby "prey on the people"?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.