You're aware that the evidence you cite is based on evolutionary theory, right?
I can't speak for stormer, but for me, I find it a lot easier to believe that, under the right conditions, fragmentary bits of soft tissue can be preserved inside fossilized bones for 70 million years than that the methods of determining the ages of rocks and fossils developed over the past 200 years are millions of years off. The latter is like claiming the heliocentric theory is right after all; the former is like finding an asteroid that orbits the earth rather than the sun. They're not equivalent challenges.
Haha, that’s funny! You are so psychologically attached to your junk science that you actually believe that soft tissue can last tens of millions of years! That’s pathetic. Y’all are stupid!