[ansel12]

Only a libertarian could be so ridiculous as to defend homosexuality and abortion and polygamy and drugs gambling and hookers and every sin known to man almost, and pretend that it isn’t immoral.

You wouldn’t have lasted a day preaching your junk to 1790 Americans.

[x]

Which answers the question, "Who are is he going to go after next?"

And now a poem ...

First you came for the Mormons,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Mormon.

Then you came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Catholic.

Then you came for the women,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a woman.

Then you came for the libertarians,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a libertarian.

Then you came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.

Next the more substantive part of the program ...

Has it occurred to you that what you mean by "libertarianism" and what other people mean by "libertarianism" aren't the same thing?

Do you think that you could work with your opponents to clarify just what each of you is talking about?

[uncommonsense]

"You wouldn’t have lasted a day preaching your junk to 1790 Americans."

Where do you think I got my preaching materials. Ever heard of John Locke or Thomas Paine?

You are at best ill informed and unhinged with your ad homonym attacks, red herrings, and straw men.

Have a wonderful life in your "democratic" wonderland. (By the way, we live in a constitutional republic, not a "democracy". That may be what is skewing your perspective).