Sandy Hook Actors

internet ^ | 16 march 2013 | self

[mnehring]

I see nothing about Rosin in that.

[danamco]

NO, because you want to muddying the water like the old Miami hack did in your own State, also slaughtering large amount of children, right???

[danamco]

See previous post!!!

[Tainan]

Newtown was a small town, apparently you have never lived in a small town.

You would be wrong. Its not nice to make assumptions.
Again, read the OP - as evidenced there is much room for discussion of this topic.
A bit surprised by so many wanting to stifle intelligent review of this incident.
Its quite obvious that there are quite a few oddities and unanswered questions.

[Ditter]

I lived in a small town for 16 years, you could fart on one side and it was immediately reported on the other side of town. My point was you cannot have 6 adults and 20 children in a small town die and be buried and it be a lie. Are there some details that one person has reported one way and someone else report a different way? Probably, but for the whole affair to be a hoax? No.

[GSWarrior]

My experience is that when a thread begins with the phrase “I usually don’t subscribe to conspiracy theories” the poster invariably does just that.

[Longbow1969]

Sadly I think the fruitcake population on our side has been rising. It used to just populate the left.

Yup. It's mostly because we are losing. When people start losing influence and elections, many tend to blame conspiracies for all the problems. It's sad to watch. We are just going to have to be vigilant to call the nutters out and make sure the general public understands that conservatism is not associated with a bunch of loopy conspiracy theorists.

[danamco]

Since you have alluded that the S.H. shooting is NOT in the line of conspiracy and that all fb’s postings are HOAXES, maybe you can explain this video in more detail. It’s too small text for me to read???

Thank you!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ahbd46Q8r_g#.UUnjHZt83lU.facebook

[danamco]

Is this the same person we’ve seen here regarding the B.C.???

http://moralmatters.org/2013/03/01/sandy-hook-the-real-conspiracy-theorists-by-dr-ronald-j-polland/

[Prole]

I don't give a rat's whisker if anyone thinks I am crazy on this.

Here are the facts:

Robbie Parker is NOT a "grieving father."

Gene Rosen, eye witness to the "shooting victims," is a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

Sally Cox, eye witness to the "shooting," is a PATHOLOGICAL LIAR.

Victoria Soto's brother is a LIAR and a FAKER regarding his emotional response to the death of Victoria.

I recommend folks start analyzing EACH INDIVIDUAL who is connected as a "griever" or "witness," and you will see a litany of non-verbal behaviors and clear LIES that are totally inappropriate for the "shooting."

Who smirks like this at the "funeral" for his "daughter?"

Who smiles or laughs after finding out his "daughter" was just "murdered?"

Not one single interview from the "families" or "witnesses" shows us a single genuine tear. Just a bunch of fake crying and phony emotions. Don't believe me? Watch the interviews and see for yourself. These people are all frauds, and only a fool believes their lies and chicanery.

[Prole]

Bingo!

Finally, someone else does a juxtaposition of Sandy Hook to Columbine.

There are distinct differences in both events, given that Columbine was a REAL SHOOTING whereas Sandy Hook was NOT.

The human emotion on display at both events shows polar opposite responses and behavior. The people at Columbine were really crying and really scared because the gunfire was real. The people at Sandy Hook fake their crying and fake their emotions because there was nothing to grieve from the beginning.

It was all staged by the same people who tried to stage "violence at the border" via Fast and Furious as a problem perpetuated by gun store owners in America. Fast and Furious backfired, and Sandy Hook backfired for those of us who know and understand genuine human emotion.

[Tainan]

Good points and thanks for posting the pics supporting your comments.
This is pertinent to the reason I started this thread - There ARE serious problems with how this incident has been portrayed to the public.
The actors brought forth are suspect in their involvement.
As to what they are suspect of...well...that's the relevant issue.

[Tainan]

My experience is that when a thread begins with the phrase “I usually don’t subscribe to conspiracy theories” the poster invariably does just that.

As I am the person being referred to by your snark remark; I might remind you of the common courtesy of pinging the person being mentioned.

My intention for this thread was plainly stated in the OP. One persons need to label theories divergent from what is commonly accepted as "conspiracy" can be detrimental to a complete understanding of events.

I could just as easily ask you -> Why do you want to stifle any discussion or further investigation by FR members of this events given the subsequent items that have surfaced?

But I won't ask you that question.

Perhaps a re-read of what has been brought out regarding this incident will be seen as an isolated incident by a savagely deranged person. So be it.

But...and I stress the word 'but'...perhaps the items shown relevant will indicate that there is sufficient reason to see an alignment with a greater action at work.

Thus my original post.