Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: melancholy

It has been explained to you many times. Allegations in civil suits are not proven by the Plaintiff. Proof, certified documents, authenicated certificates, affidavits, and eye-witness testimony are ignored by the Court until the defendant files an answer.

If the defendant does not deny the allegations, the only option the Court has is to rule the allegations have merit. If the defendant denies the allegations, the discovery process begins. Obama’s Certificate of Naturalization can be subpoenaed. Internet postings and jpeg images downloaded from internet are ignored by the Court.

Stop trying to protect Obama. He’s ineligible because he naturalized in 1983. It’s a shame you can’t take my word for it, but I’ll continue posting the facts while you desperately try to quash the truth.


79 posted on 03/12/2013 1:18:02 PM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: SvenMagnussen; LucyT; azishot; WildHighlander57; Flotsam_Jetsome

One more time, Sven, since you’re pretending to be thick. I am NOT INTERESTED in your legalese garbage.

I DARE YOU TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS, WHICH I COPIED FROM A PREVIOUS POST TO YOU:

Speaking of a TV soap opera, in the spring/summer of last year, you posted that your “precious” evidence will be unveiled on TV TALK SHOW APPEARENCE COME OCTOBER ‘12 and that your doubters and detractors would see you parading it on TV for all to see! You didn’t say a word then about the illegality of what you were about to do.

No offense, I wrote the abundantly used word, “precious,” just to be hip and to keep up with the newspeak on this thread.

Oh, BTW, don’t ask for a link to that post because FR’s database isn’t allowing to access more than the current page of previous posts. If you deny what you wrote at the time, I’m sure some FReepers will remember your tease for the fall season coming attraction.

Also, while you’re at it, what happened to your camarad-in-arms, Todd Rodriguez, Ret.? Do you have any explanation as to why would a FReeper in good standing (not a troll, God forbid!) such as yourself, resort to unacceptable behavior like that? Were you issued a warning instead of a ticket?

Who are the “OBOTS and ConcernedFreepers” [sic]? Care to name some of those faux Conservative FReeper trolls? They’re having a go at each other on the thread that’s not because they’re trolls, IMO, but because they have passionate differences in opinions.

Failure to answer ANY of the above questions, and I repeat myself, will speak volumes about what you’re doing here.


85 posted on 03/12/2013 1:58:01 PM PDT by melancholy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: SvenMagnussen; LucyT
It’s a shame you can’t take my word for it, but I’ll continue posting the facts while you desperately try to quash the truth.

What facts? It's a shame that you refused to share any of your claimed "facts" with Sheriff Joe's investigative team.

The fact that you chose to ignore the investigators, in addition to the other non-occurring big event which you claimed would happen last year, makes you very unbelievable.
109 posted on 03/12/2013 4:53:27 PM PDT by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson