The funny thing is, I have followed the citizen-parent claims now for what, a couple of years?
And out of some 4,500 institutions of higher learning in the United States of America, with gosh-knows-how-many Professors and other "experts" in Constitutional law (If we say even a couple per college / university, that's at least 10,000), and in a country where we have 1.1 million licensed attorneys, Herb Titus is the ONLY person who even pretends to have any real Constitutional-type credentials that is making this claim.
Not one single other person in the entire country of any stature at all supports Titus and the two-citizen-parent birthers.
And his claim is based on a grand total of 6 and a half minutes of YouTube video, and on no authority except for his own OPINION as to what the "law of nature" is.
He cites not one single authority. He gives no evidence from history or any historical or legal authority at all to support his view.
It is simply his own opinion, and he gives no evidence at all that it is based on anything other than his own personal opinion.
That's not any kind of legal evidence at all. It is simply... nothing.
AND HERB TITUS IS THE "BEST" VOICE THAT BIRTHERS HAVE.
Against that, we have... well, the entire weight of history and law.
By the way, Titus is completely clueless about where "natural born citizen" came from. It came directly from "natural born subject" in the law of England, our mother country. And THAT did come from natural law, as explained at the bottom of the graphic at the end of the post I just referenced.
Too bad that the US federal govt is not founded on English common law.
Our Founding proclaims “all men are created equal”. Being subjected to an individual calling himself “king” is antithetical to our Founding principles.
America is exceptional because of our fundamental principles.
The state cases cited in the linked post are not relevant.
What are your credentials compared to Dr. Herb Titus, Constitutional Scholar?