SvenMagnussen,
You’re still calling FReepers who disagree with you “OBOTS and ConcernedFreepers.” In a previous post, you called me a liar. Well, let’s see if you man up to what you previously said and answer this post with no irrelevant legal answers.
What do you say to your last year’s claim that you’ll appear on TV in 10/2012 to parade your evidence?
Since I couldn’t get your original post where you posted that claim, but the mods could, I got the next best thing, you’re discussing that post. It happened that I also posted in the same conversation.
Here it is in a neat package:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2946139/replies?c=80
Are we going to get a direct answer from you, since your mouthpiece, Todd Rodriguez, was zotted?
Oh yes, if you’re in an answering mood, don’t forget to include answering what was posted to you below. (Edited for content.) Enough ducking and running.
“I DARE YOU TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS, WHICH I COPIED FROM A PREVIOUS POST TO YOU:
Speaking of a TV soap opera, in the spring/summer of last year, you posted that your precious evidence will be unveiled on TV TALK SHOW APPEARENCE COME OCTOBER 12 and that your doubters and detractors would see you parading it on TV for all to see! You didnt say a word then about the illegality of what you were about to do.
Snip......
Also, while youre at it, what happened to your camarad-in-arms, Todd Rodriguez, Ret.? Do you have any explanation as to why would a FReeper in good standing (not a troll, God forbid!) such as yourself, resort to unacceptable behavior like that? Were you issued a warning instead of a ticket?
Who are the OBOTS and ConcernedFreepers [sic]? Care to name some of those faux Conservative FReeper trolls?
Snip....
Failure to answer ANY of the above questions, and I repeat myself, will speak volumes about what youre doing here.
QUIT STALLING. I STILL DARE YOU TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2995763/posts?page=97#97
Place for this learned discussion, from which as always I learn something, or have something I thought I knew challenged,... well its place is not here entre nous us intellectual paragons.
This discussion should be taking place at the SCOTUS. Bunch a black-robed bumkissers sitting around the card table trading constitutional jargon of a high order. Clerks rushing in with drinks, towels, bandages as needed.
It's what we pay the wrinkled old bastards for; to take cases on appeal. Plenty of such cases have reached the office, only to be rejected on highly suspicious grounds. Do your job boys and girls. Enquiring minds want to know.
Me, for instance. Kenny needs to know what a citizen is. Is the offshoot of a coupla illegal aliens a citizen? What is a natural born Citizen? (Note constitutionally correct capitalization.) Can we please get this straight? I have lived in a number of countries and they don't seem to have this problem, or at least as badly as we do. You either is, or you ain't.
Now don't take any of this personally, FReepers, whether you agree with me or not. But if your paycheck isn't coming from the SCOTUS, you could be wrong. I could be wrong. Until this effeminate son of a Kenyan came along, it was traditional that natural born meant that both a your parents were citizens, or so I was taught. That simplistic back-country notion might be way off base, which is why I need the boys up at the SCOTUS to please do their job and straighten me out one way or the other.
Now about this Hawaii situation. If the guy's father wasn't an American citizen, I personally don't give a rat's pudendum if he was born while his mother slid into home plate in Honolulu on the Fourth of July with the Marine Band playing The Star Spangled Banner. (I would however, have paid good money to have seen that.)
Carry on with Minor vs Wong Kim Happenstood vs any utility citations to be named. You birth certificate guys carry on with your pixilations and forgeries. (DUH! Of course they're fake. Don't bug me. See if you can get'em into a court.)
So, don't flame me back. Flame the SCOTUS. They're paid to take the heat. And, they owe me an explanation or two.