[MamaTexan]

You really are concerned with the accuracy of evidence as you espouse yourself to be, you should do something about the erroneous graph on your homepage since the decision of Wong Kim Ark never said he was a natural-born citizen

[Stepan12]

This talk of Wong Ark Kim being applicable to Natural Born Citizens is ridiculous. The remarks in Wong Ark Kim are what is called the dicta of an opinion. It is not the ruling such as we have in Minor vs Haperstadt (sp) and should not be seriously regarded as one. Wong Ark Kim is irrelevant as regards the issue of natural born citizenship.

[Jeff Winston]

You really are concerned with the accuracy of evidence as you espouse yourself to be, you should do something about the erroneous graph on your homepage since the decision of Wong Kim Ark never said he was a natural-born citizen.

No, but the entire rationale of the case, for dozens and dozens of pages, had to do with who was and was not "natural born."

Perhaps you can also explain why the dissent said the majority's decision made people like Wong Kim Ark eligible to be President?

Since you've found my page, you've also found the FACT that I have clear and pretty much conclusive evidence that it was NOT Vattel who contributed "Offences against the Law of Nations" to our Constitution. But you don't mention that. I wonder why?

Oh, wait. We know why, don't we? It's because you already decided that you clearly prefer your birther fantasy to reality, that no evidence and no reality would ever change your mind.