I see you choose not to answer the two simple yes or no questions I asked you.
Let’s try again:
1) Are you prepared to go with what the EVIDENCE says regarding where “offences against law of nations” came from in our Constitution?
2) Prior to my asking, had you ever carefully read the Opinion in US v. Wong Kim Ark, from start to finish?
These are not hard questions. Yes, or no.
I can deal with your other twistings after we’ve dealt with those.
I DO NOT have to justify my opinions any further to you, as I have already provided sources to substantiate my position.
Everything everyone has provided as evidence has been conveniently ignored BY YOU
Your behavior has been arrogant and belittling, you have substantiated NOTHING, and added nothing positive whatsoever to the conversation.
Yet you consistently make childish demands of people that they ‘agree’ to something based on your conditions and on your opinion that what you have to offer is of any value at all.
You have already been asked once if you think we’re all stupid…well, if you think we'll fall for THAT one, it's obvious that you do.
-----
I'd like to rephrase my earlier statement to you -
Go play your stupid little ego-stroking games by yourself.