Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

Why does the 14th mention ‘naturalized citizen’ and draws a distinction between them and ‘citizens’?


693 posted on 03/10/2013 12:01:53 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (Texas is a state of mind - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge
Why does the 14th mention ‘naturalized citizen’ and draws a distinction between them and ‘citizens’?

Because they aren't the same thing. Former slaves were not "naturalized" in the conventional sense. They were "naturalized" en masse by passage of the 14th amendment.

Now a question for you. Why aren't the words "natural born" right next to the word "citizens" in the 14th amendment? Was ink too expensive?

1,127 posted on 03/11/2013 2:29:10 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson